In a recent decision, a judge in Texas has allegedly struck down a law that Attorney General Ken Paxton has frequently used to investigate companies and nonprofits. The ruling was made in response to a lawsuit filed by a pharmaceutical company that was being investigated under the law. The judge found that the law was unconstitutional as it allowed Paxton to issue civil investigative demands without judicial oversight. This process was deemed to violate the company’s constitutional rights.
The law in question, known as Texas’ consumer protection law, has been a tool often used by Paxton to conduct investigations into various entities. This ruling could potentially have broader implications for how Paxton and the Attorney General’s Office are able to investigate companies and nonprofits in the future.
Critics of the law argue that it gives the Attorney General’s Office too much power and allows for potential abuses of authority. They believe that requiring judicial oversight for civil investigative demands is necessary to protect the rights of those being investigated.
Paxton, on the other hand, has defended his use of the law as a necessary tool to protect consumers from fraud and misconduct. He has indicated that he may appeal the ruling in order to continue using the law for investigations.
Overall, this ruling could signal a shift in how investigations are conducted by the Texas Attorney General’s Office. It remains to be seen how this decision will impact future investigations and the powers of the Attorney General in Texas.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com